The Essence of Evolution

If they think about it at all, most people regard evolution as something to do with fossil specimens in museums, a chap called Darwin, and ‘survival of the fittest’.  The whole business has come to the boil recently in an ongoing controversy about the influence of genes in determining individual characteristics, performance and behaviour.  The contention that human beings along with all other creatures are little more than vehicles for the onward transmission of genes has provoked a furious reaction in religious and academic circles.   But it would be foolish to regard all this as off-stage academic stuff of little practical relevance to mundane affairs; certain features of the evolutionary dynamic have profound implications for our survival as a race and nation:

  • Evolution is essentially about the survival of certain species at the expense of others in competition for the same territory and resources;

  • There are only three survival relationships in nature, namely:

  1. Predator/Prey, the former existing at the expense of the latter

  2. Host/Parasite, the latter existing at the expense of the former

  3. Symbiosis, i.e. mutually advantageous; and these relationships apply with no less force to the racial and cultural divisions of humanity.

  • Humankind is now using genetics for selective breeding of certain plants and animals that it wishes to exploit.

  • Politicians are subverting the evolutionary dynamic by ‘social engineering’, geared to survival of the most instead of the fittest.  While purporting to be mutually advantageous cooperation (symbiosis), this dysgenic policy actually facilitates the survival and proliferation of parasites and can only result in degradation of the most advanced races and nations.

  • The fact that most human beings also exhibit some degree of altruism does not reduce let alone remove the basic imperatives of survival in an always competitive world.  

Competition for the most habitable territory and limited resources remains as implacable as ever it was; and those not actively and wholeheartedly engaged in winning that competition are already losing it.

There are no reasonable compromises or negotiated settlements; no concessions for being awfully nice.  Only the winning can afford to be charitable, and the comfort -blanket of liberal self-righteousness affords no protection at all against the spears of alien competition.  Nature is amoral, and self-sacrificing philanthropy is rank treachery when it threatens the survival of kith and kin.  Altruism begins at home.   Accordingly, any political platform which ignores this evolutionary imperative is an invitation to racial and national suicide.   All the democratic cant in the world cannot evade the fact that it leads inevitably to the most numerous, not the most deserving, inheriting the earth.  

The utopian fantasies of religion and liberalism run counter to the evolutionary process and can therefore only result in national disintegration, mongrelised populations, cultural stagnation, civil strife and tyrannous bureaucracy.  With many constituencies now swamped with aliens, the upshot of the ‘democratic process’ is that it takes only one of these constituencies to tip the scales in favour of even more renegade legislation.   Local government in London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leicester, Oldham, Bristol and many other areas is now burdened with immigrants at a crippling cost to the indigenous population.  Nationally, our health, education and social services are rapidly becoming a domestic branch of overseas aid; and internationally, because of the huge numerical superiority of Third World populations and countries, we are always going to be out-voted in supra-national agencies like the so-called United Nations Assembly.   The most clamorous countries and races in support of ‘global village’ politics are invariably those with everything to gain and nothing much to lose from all resource-sharing cooperatives.  Most of them will never be anything more than camp-followers of Western civilisation.  Thus the culturally-advanced races and nations on this increasingly overcrowded planet now find themselves harassed and howled down in the councils of the world, invaded by races with negligible assets or potential, and betrayed from within by renegade politicians. 

Future historians worthy of the name will identify the following elements of Britain’s decline in the 20th century:

  • Two unnecessary and ruinous wars with Germany which took the best of our men folk, impoverished the nation, broke up the world’s most successful empire, allowed a huge expansion of  Communist tyranny and unleashed  Third World barbarism. 

  • The massive influx of Third World immigrants after 1945 ,with the inevitable results of  cultural and civic squalor, drug and crime epidemics, race riots, bankrupt social services, and an utterly  demoralised native population.

  • Entry into the European Union, which crippled our own economy, subsidised less successful countries at our expense, cost billions of pounds due to EU fraud and incompetence, and transferred most of our governance to a Brussels bureaucracy.

  • The burgeoning of the Welfare State and associated ‘dependency culture’, associated with clamorous ‘human rights’ lobbies, erosion of family values, strident feminism, sexual promiscuity ; all parasitical upon an ever-diminishing wealth-producing sector.

  • The ‘free market’/globalist policy which ruined many British industries, allowed a huge influx of foreign manufactures and the migration of capital to cheap labour areas in the Third World.

  • The overweaning power and decadent influence of the mass media in debasing our cultural heritage, corrupting our youth and facilitating national decline.

These historians will also note how our most illustrious national heroes were reduced to apologetic footnotes in school history textbooks, and replaced by prominent exponents of political correctness.

F Kimbal Johnson

September 2008

Back to Articles            Back to News