|
The Essence of Evolution If they think about it at all, most people regard evolution as something to do with fossil specimens in museums, a chap called Darwin, and ‘survival of the fittest’. The whole business has come to the boil recently in an ongoing controversy about the influence of genes in determining individual characteristics, performance and behaviour. The contention that human beings along with all other creatures are little more than vehicles for the onward transmission of genes has provoked a furious reaction in religious and academic circles. But it would be foolish to regard all this as off-stage academic stuff of little practical relevance to mundane affairs; certain features of the evolutionary dynamic have profound implications for our survival as a race and nation:
Competition for the most habitable territory and limited resources remains as implacable as ever it was; and those not actively and wholeheartedly engaged in winning that competition are already losing it. There are no reasonable compromises or negotiated settlements; no concessions for being awfully nice. Only the winning can afford to be charitable, and the comfort -blanket of liberal self-righteousness affords no protection at all against the spears of alien competition. Nature is amoral, and self-sacrificing philanthropy is rank treachery when it threatens the survival of kith and kin. Altruism begins at home. Accordingly, any political platform which ignores this evolutionary imperative is an invitation to racial and national suicide. All the democratic cant in the world cannot evade the fact that it leads inevitably to the most numerous, not the most deserving, inheriting the earth. The utopian fantasies of religion and liberalism run counter to the evolutionary process and can therefore only result in national disintegration, mongrelised populations, cultural stagnation, civil strife and tyrannous bureaucracy. With many constituencies now swamped with aliens, the upshot of the ‘democratic process’ is that it takes only one of these constituencies to tip the scales in favour of even more renegade legislation. Local government in London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leicester, Oldham, Bristol and many other areas is now burdened with immigrants at a crippling cost to the indigenous population. Nationally, our health, education and social services are rapidly becoming a domestic branch of overseas aid; and internationally, because of the huge numerical superiority of Third World populations and countries, we are always going to be out-voted in supra-national agencies like the so-called United Nations Assembly. The most clamorous countries and races in support of ‘global village’ politics are invariably those with everything to gain and nothing much to lose from all resource-sharing cooperatives. Most of them will never be anything more than camp-followers of Western civilisation. Thus the culturally-advanced races and nations on this increasingly overcrowded planet now find themselves harassed and howled down in the councils of the world, invaded by races with negligible assets or potential, and betrayed from within by renegade politicians. Future historians worthy of the name will identify the following elements of Britain’s decline in the 20th century:
These historians will also note how our most illustrious national heroes were reduced to apologetic footnotes in school history textbooks, and replaced by prominent exponents of political correctness. F Kimbal Johnson September 2008
|